As we now start to learn more about the monster's story and what happened to him after Frankenstein abandoned him, we can see how he learned and developed on his own. This challenges some of our beliefs and thoughts about what is good in the novel and what is "bad." Let's consider our two main characters: Frankenstein and the monster. These are questions you thought about last time:
Then, respond to ONE other classmate with a complete idea (beyond "I agree" or "That's well said") or with a question you might have about their post.
Your initial post should be answered by the end of class, and your response should be in before class on Friday, 9/21.
***I would suggest you first think about your response and type it in a Word document, saving it there before you copy and paste it over into the comment box.
- If Frankenstein is the creator of this monster, what were his responsibilities to his creation? Was he wrong to want to create the monster? Was it really that bad for Frankenstein to be so passionate about science and physiology? Is there a point where science goes too far and doesn't take responsibility for the emotional leverage of their work?
- What should the monster expect from Frankenstein? Is he responsible for his own actions, or does he really understand what he is doing until he is taught? Where do we learn about our emotions and how to control/express them? Is the monster really a monster, or simply called such because of his inglorious beginning?
Then, respond to ONE other classmate with a complete idea (beyond "I agree" or "That's well said") or with a question you might have about their post.
Your initial post should be answered by the end of class, and your response should be in before class on Friday, 9/21.
***I would suggest you first think about your response and type it in a Word document, saving it there before you copy and paste it over into the comment box.